|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
“India Corporate Finance”
– Blog “The week that was” - Blog |
Our
Blog |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is there a relationship between the top-line and size of a term
loan? I have been confronted by this question in a recent
proposal. To my knowledge there is no popular, well
established norm or ratio or rule in this respect, Yet I faced lack of
comfort from banks in this cases, which prompted me to contemplate and share
my views in this article.
The organization being involved in basic educational services, has a relatively small top-line, even though the
average EBDITA and PAT margins are healthy compared to any Indian Small and
Medium Enterprise (SME). With the same bottom-line but with bigger top-line of say five
times seems to add greater comfort to bankers, even though the key margins
may have been poorer, as follows:
So what could possible reason for the additional comfort when
the bottom-line is the same but the top-line is five times more? I think, the logic is that when a substantial cash flow,
relative to the total size of the loan is present, in case of a financial
stress, the organization could be in a better position to service the loan in
time, by delaying or withholding the payments due to other unsecured
creditors like suppliers of goods and services, thereby ensuring that their
loan is serviced without delay or default. I welcome your comments. P.Anand Author |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I Our Team I Our Investment Banking Arm I Our Clients I Contact us I |